Lenovo 82JQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics94.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory16 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 21:55
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 37.6
1-Core 61
2-Core 116
40% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 399
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A4F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.4% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 154
Parallax 146
103% 142 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 78.6
78% 98.7 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L2 1TB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,415
Write 1,526
Mixed 1,360
321% 1,434 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 45.7
105% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 411
374% 382 MB/s
Poor: 180% Great: 339%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
39GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 250
Mixed 205
53% 228 MB/s
DQ Read 65
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 152
102% 121 MB/s
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 17.3
53% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4D22M3200BL-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.3% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 31.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 4 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0A40
Typical 82JQ Builds (Compare 3,691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 82JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback