Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 55 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 117 48% 81 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 157 21% 157 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 16C0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	4.32% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 5.3 4% 4.73 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 5 Splatting 7.8 5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.32% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 1TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 453GB free (System drive) Firmware: Y230419a SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 230 270 207 251 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 365 Write 321 Mixed 333 SusWrite 238 71% 314 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 28.2 97% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 174 124% 160 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT52L512M32D2PF-10 2x4GB 8,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 17.5 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	53	60	12.6"	1280 720	BOE06AC

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	12x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	4x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	16x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	6x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	5x
SD8SN8U512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 72%, 4,967 samples	4x

RAM
MT52L512M32D2PF-10 2x4GBMicronBench 58%, 8,965 samples	8x
H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NUD 2x8GBHynixBench 62%, 2,527 samples	7x
K4E6E304EB-EGCF 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 7,516 samples	1x