Today's hottest deals

Medion E15410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMedion E15410  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MF50CM
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 22:52
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 39
8-Core 337
18% 188 Pts
64-Core 61.8
4% 61.8 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A04B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.6
6% 7.23 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 9
Splatting 0.2
5% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NSN025SA356-Y01Q2R0 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 33 35 32 39 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 398
Write 152
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 31.2
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 1
33% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 0.9
38% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E85-2666E Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FN 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.4% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 21.5
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0700
Typical E15410 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E15410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback