Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics171% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 23:08
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 245
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 859
78% 654 Pts
64-Core 1,272
79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
MSI(1462 3951) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
171% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 235
Parallax 410
166% 283 fps
MRender 372
Gravity 162
Splatting 310
231% 281 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 171%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2360 2404 2440 2503 2501 2503 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 1,861
Write 2,487
Mixed 1,980
SusWrite 2,452
498% 2,195 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 69.2
229% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,098
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 912
679% 910 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 336%
Great: 486%
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B07 2TB
402GB free
Firmware: GXB7302Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1198 1228 1226 1220 1227 1228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,367
Write 1,259
Mixed 1,254
SusWrite 1,221
287% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 80.8
260% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,133
DQ Write 860
DQ Mixed 965
730% 986 MB/s
Poor: 255%
This bench: 255%
Great: 461%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: T9C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 249 253 253 250 250 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 6% Great: 135%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
58GB free, PID 6410
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 25 38 57 54 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 175
Write 74.9
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 57.3
86% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.5
118% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 33.4
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 27" 1280 720 SAM0DC9 C27FG70
Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback