Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '18 at 21:47
Run Duration	94 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 82 2-Core 157 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 372 41% 322 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310 4,147 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0733) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.28% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.51 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 2 2% 2.05 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.28% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0809 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 46 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2048 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2552 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1686 (AA) Unknown 100 100 1 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 136 (AD) Unknown 98 98 77 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (B5) Unknown 100 100 33093044210420 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 41491 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 84 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 5282 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	37.2% Below average	Read 266 Write 178 Mixed 197 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 5.86 35% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 13.8 41% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D ID:80 2C 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D 44GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.9 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 12.7 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 57.8 69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16