Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive581% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 12:03
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 198
2-Core 394
115% 223 Pts
4-Core 737
8-Core 1,354
125% 1,045 Pts
64-Core 2,331
144% 2,331 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 170F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 11.6
8% 12.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.77 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4293 4217 3423 1364 1358 1351 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
581% Outstanding
Read 5,009
Write 4500
Mixed 2,844
SusWrite 2,668
840% 3,755 MB/s
4K Read 87.2
4K Write 341
4K Mixed 134
484% 187 MB/s
DQ Read 1,790
DQ Write 1,293
DQ Mixed 1627
1,192% 1570 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 581%
Great: 581%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 B 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 46 165 16" 1280 720 AUOCDAB
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback