MSI MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D32)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 135%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive423% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D32
MotherboardMSI MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D32)  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230914
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 16:19
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700KF-$374
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 227
2-Core 460
135% 261 Pts
4-Core 930
8-Core 1,592
153% 1,261 Pts
64-Core 3639
225% 3639 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B07 512GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7602Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3112 955 941 936 939 929 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
423% Outstanding
Read 2942
Write 3,232
Mixed 2,935
SusWrite 1302
586% 2,603 MB/s
4K Read 85.5
4K Write 267
4K Mixed 128
434% 160 MB/s
DQ Read 2,325
DQ Write 1,778
DQ Mixed 2,026
1,522% 2,043 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 423%
Great: 423%
GVR1TB 1TB
50GB free
Firmware: VC0S036H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 150 192 158 157 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,751
Write 264
Mixed 520
SusWrite 165
146% 675 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 72.7
267% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 532
379% 495 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 184%
Great: 288%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 135 134 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 137
Write 144
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 133
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 84%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$106
696GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 105 105 107 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 111
Write 122
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 105
67% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 108%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
9GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 10 10 9.9 9.6 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 103
Write 17.6
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 9.4
30% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
73% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
233% Outstanding
MC Read 99.4
MC Write 89.9
MC Mixed 89
265% 92.8 GB/s
SC Read 32.3
SC Write 48.5
SC Mixed 38.9
114% 39.9 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 233%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 49 144 0" 1280 720
Typical MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D32) Builds (Compare 2,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 250%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z690 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D32)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $1,099
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback