MSI MS-17K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Raider GE76 12UE
MotherboardMSI MS-17K4  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 06:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 71.3
1-Core 188
2-Core 361
107% 207 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1169
112% 924 Pts
64-Core 1776
110% 1776 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 1324) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 28.4
21% 28 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 11.9
19% 24.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2511 2401 2477 2651 2655 2660 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 1,812
Write 2,426
Mixed 2,029
SusWrite 2,559
501% 2,206 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 251
4K Mixed 94.3
336% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,387
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1,187
889% 1,193 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 386%
Great: 417%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc SD5-5600 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
146% Outstanding
MC Read 58.9
MC Write 55.5
MC Mixed 56.6
163% 57 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 146%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO978F
Typical MS-17K4 Builds (Compare 1,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-17K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback