Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17Q2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive427% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q2  (all builds)
Memory113.1 GB free of 128 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 12:51
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 64.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 223
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 627
66% 529 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13C4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 10.5
7% 11 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2858 3143 3531 3598 3645 3731 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 3,693
Write 3,273
Mixed 1,582
SusWrite 3,418
671% 2,992 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 23.7
117% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 791
601% 811 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 427%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88AGBSA092N 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 39.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 17.2" 1280 720 AUO41A2
Typical MS-17Q2 Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback