Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	45.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '18 at 10:38
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 483 55% 431 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2122 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Lighting 72.2 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 56.3 59% 65.9 fps	MRender 75 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 73.9 60% 72.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra II 500GB 3,299 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 234GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 679 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 286 (A5) Unknown 100 100 15073468 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 61 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (A9) Unknown 100 100 362 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 168 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 609 (BC) Unknown 100 100 8 (C2) HDA temperature 68 68 292058693664 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 227634184245 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 863 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2048 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1800 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1782 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	79.1% Very good	Read 446 Write 444 Mixed 355 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 16.8 102% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 16.5 37% 72 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 864GB free Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 103 99 5415208 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1151 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 89395097 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7304 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1127 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 63 487784477 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1029 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 10845 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 42949672989 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -106283260699568 (F1) Unknown 100 253 15783997510277 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -80826051327995	115% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 201 Mixed 182 146% 194 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.44 123% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 112%
WD WD2502ABYS-02B7A0 251GB 1,793 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 234GB free Firmware: 3B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 11 (03) Spinup time 159 158 3033 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 486 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 8009 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 456 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 259 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 486 (C2) HDA temperature 110 90 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 194 1984 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.3% Good	Read 112 Write 112 Mixed 104 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.24 4K Mixed 0.45 124% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A KHX1600C10D3/ Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A KHX1600C10D3/ Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1866C11D3/ 48GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	90.1% Outstanding	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 37.7 MC Mixed 33.9 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.9 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	8x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	15x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	4x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	4x

RAM
M393B5170EH1- 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 40 samples	9x
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 39 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353