Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 297%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory45.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '23 at 20:53
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KF-$459
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 227
2-Core 455
128% 252 Pts
4-Core 896
8-Core 1,623
151% 1,259 Pts
64-Core 4,144
256% 4,144 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Zotac(19DA 2714) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 266
Reflection 256
Parallax 270
216% 264 fps
MRender 335
Gravity 225
Splatting 181
194% 247 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 187%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FPD002T 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1421 1363 1542 322 297 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,779
Write 1,548
Mixed 1,288
SusWrite 901
309% 1,379 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 62.7
221% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 869
658% 873 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 233%
Great: 374%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
461GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1438 1034 1039 1067 1086 1127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 2,436
Write 2,350
Mixed 1,709
SusWrite 1,132
427% 1,907 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 96.2
328% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,842
DQ Write 1,416
DQ Mixed 1,583
1,196% 1,613 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 341%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 136 129 137 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61% Good
Read 78.1
Write 126
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 134
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK5X32G2B52C40A2 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 64.5
MC Write 62.4
MC Mixed 48.1
167% 58.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 150%
Great: 191%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 217 59 144 27" 1280 720 ACR064D Acer XF270H B
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 3,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback