Today's hottest deals

Asus P9D-V Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus P9D-V Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P9D-V Series
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 12:31
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 154
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 247
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 114
Parallax 115
85% 111 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 105
Splatting 101
82% 99.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$28
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 7.7 60 19 4.5 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 394
Write 331
Mixed 211
SusWrite 62.4
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 4.2
47% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 70.8
DQ Mixed 43.8
46% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$42
285GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 115
Write 106
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 114
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965413-013.A01LF 9905458-009.A00LF 9965525-008.A00LF 9905458-009.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 8 189 9 60 27.2" 1280 779 KGN0018 KAMN24QFMA
Typical P9D-V Series Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: Asus P9D-V Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback