Acer Aspire MM1-571

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire MM1-571  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire MM1-571
Memory5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160808
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 19:51
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 41.7
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 77.5
34% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 118
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Acer(1025 111D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 5.5
3% 5.83 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
602GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 245 254 270 278 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 292
Write 331
Mixed 265
SusWrite 262
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 19.7
60% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 110
88% 126 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
D3L16S28MP-4G-ACER Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 33 60 57.8" 1280 720 PHL0000 Philips FTV
Typical Aspire MM1-571 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire MM1-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback