Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '23 at 02:52
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 386
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$146
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 51.5
44% 54 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 45.4
42% 52.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 256GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 30 29 33 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 415
Write 50.8
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 35.4
28% 131 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 13.3
55% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 88%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
44GB free
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 231 169 395 299 313 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 265
Write 113
Mixed 194
SusWrite 286
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 36.4
128% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 206
172% 246 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 22 165 27" 1280 720 LHC0027 N27S-PLUS
Typical GA-H310M S2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback