HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory122.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '24 at 12:15
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 150
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 454
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 170
Parallax 159
145% 169 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 133
Splatting 115
114% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BX40 400GB
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0150
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 391
Write 363
Mixed 283
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 23.4
78% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 246
184% 246 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 92%
Toshiba MG04ACA1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: FJ4A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 193
Write 184
Mixed 104
119% 160 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
300% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 104%
Corsair VoyagerGT 16GB
12GB free, PID 1a90
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.8
Write 10.9
Mixed 13.2
19% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GV7AFR4C-PB Micron 18KDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 HMT41GV7AFR4C-PB Micron 18KDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 Micron 18KDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 HMT41GV7AFR4C-PB Micron 18KDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 HMT41GV7A... 128GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27A3 ASUS PB278
Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback