Dell OptiPlex 3010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3010  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '24 at 19:52
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 76
2-Core 130
57% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 119
21% 147 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM161GI 160GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 23 23 24 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 49%
Hitachi HTS542560K9SA00 60GB
55GB free
Firmware: BB1OC3JP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 55.4
Write 53.8
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 54.9
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
5GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 399
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 0.6
66% 100 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
ST910082 8AS 100GB
35GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 50.1
Write 23.9
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 24.6
36% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
17% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351U6EFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 33 60 0" 1024 748
Typical OptiPlex 3010 Builds (Compare 4,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback