Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Memory 28.6 1-Core 57.1 2-Core 77.6 31% 54.4 Pts	4-Core 75.9 8-Core 71.5 10% 73.7 Pts	64-Core 62.6 4% 62.6 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 1.8 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Neo Forza NSN135SA348-I01S400 480GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227F SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 114 139 245 139 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.2% Above average	Read 362 Write 194 Mixed 298 SusWrite 138 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 55.1 4K Mixed 10.2 83% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 15.8 48% 104 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 5 13% 4.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	9	26	7	60	11.6"	1280 720	STA0002

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	13x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	13x

SSD
480GB 480GBKimtigoBench 65%, 35 samples	6x
Forza NSN135SA348-I01S400 480GBNeoBench 52%, 3 samples	4x
SM8480GPMTCB47BECS-S114LC 480GBPhisonBench 52%, 2 samples	2x

RAM
NMSO480E82-2666E 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 42 samples	5x
NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GBUnknownBench 36%, 145 samples	5x
CMB6-5GDA1BAR01A00 1x8GBCorsairBench 33%, 25 samples	2x