Today's hottest deals

MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 231%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E26
MotherboardMSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 03:29
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$265
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 74.3
1-Core 206
2-Core 424
120% 235 Pts
4-Core 817
8-Core 1,512
139% 1,165 Pts
64-Core 1,903
118% 1,903 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 114%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
ASRock(1849 5324) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.20.01.10
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 249
Reflection 257
Parallax 483
203% 330 fps
MRender 310
Gravity 314
Splatting 287
247% 303 fps
Poor: 103%
This bench: 195%
Great: 203%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 727 590 618 614 620 621 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,217
Write 2,164
Mixed 1,436
SusWrite 632
360% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 85
274% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 1,723
DQ Write 1,259
DQ Mixed 1,402
1,072% 1,462 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 279%
Great: 340%
Seagate BarracudaFas 1TB
913GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 462 464 437 421 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 334
Write 367
Mixed 290
SusWrite 442
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 22.4
80% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 51.3
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 75.7
72% 107 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 97%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$299
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 479 479 478 478 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 464
Mixed 449
SusWrite 477
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 65.6
216% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 374
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 133%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6400C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 43
126% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 49.6
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 43.8
132% 46.3 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 124%
This bench: 124%
Great: 210%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 3R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 21% 53 215 60 60 27.8" 1280 720 GBT2701 AORUS AD27QD
History: Score 23: 0P 2R 2G 7B | Score 30: 0P 3R 3G 6B
Typical B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26) Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 245%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $1,295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback