Today's hottest deals

N/A M17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemN/A M17  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault X133
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 19:32
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Memory 20.2
1-Core 15.7
2-Core 18.7
12% 18.2 Pts
4-Core 31.8
8-Core 35.4
4% 33.6 Pts
64-Core 32.2
2% 32.2 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cf400 512GB 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HT3414B4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 109 114 140 218 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 358
Write 261
Mixed 241
SusWrite 157
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 2.2
44% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 89.6
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 4.7
22% 51 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 18 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE084E
Typical M17 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: N/A M17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback