HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 133% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '24 at 21:20
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	45%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 135 2-Core 278 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 830 76% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,174 73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	153% Outstanding	Lighting 224 Reflection 217 Parallax 225 182% 222 fps	MRender 205 Gravity 157 Splatting 139 133% 167 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$150 61,354 User benchmarks, average bench 449% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 957 1096 1213 1355 1258 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	244% Outstanding	Read 2,456 Write 1,756 Mixed 1,796 SusWrite 1,106 397% 1,778 MB/s	4K Read 61.6 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 61.1 202% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 550 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 232 198% 302 MB/s
Poor: 286% ↑ This bench: 244% Great: 587%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 930GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 268 293 311 335 319 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 430 Write 411 Mixed 339 SusWrite 291 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 33.7 104% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 96.4 DQ Mixed 177 142% 206 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 209 213 220 217 217 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 50.7 Mixed 78.1 SusWrite 211 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 183 186 181 184 189 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 110 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 182 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 49.9 Write 36.7 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 20.9 44% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.1 91% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 52.5 Write 32.9 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 20.3 42% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 92% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 24.5 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 21.8 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	63	51	60	27"	1280 720	HPN3673 OMEN 27i IPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 3,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,276x
Core i7-8700KIntel $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	729x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	597x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	761x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	362x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	295x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $50Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	364x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	176x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	158x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	405x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	227x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $514

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383