Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory50.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '24 at 22:51
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$377
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 70.8
1-Core 214
2-Core 424
120% 236 Pts
4-Core 838
8-Core 1,552
143% 1,195 Pts
64-Core 2,493
154% 2,493 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-GRE
AMD(1002 0E3B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
173% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 183
Parallax 264
164% 216 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 244
Splatting 325
244% 294 fps
Poor: 111%
This bench: 173%
Great: 227%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-6000 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
121% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 42.8
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 46.4
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 42.1
128% 44.8 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 262%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 34" 1280 720 SPT8542 Sceptre O34
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $1,046
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback