Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 14:51
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 427
54% 411 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.3% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 88
52% 71.8 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 47.5
50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 435 451 449 481 483 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 440
Mixed 383
SusWrite 451
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 38.9
130% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 435 451 449 481 483 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 431
Mixed 410
SusWrite 451
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 40.5
136% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$81
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 80 89 94 64 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 54.8
Write 197
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 83.9
66% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
278% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 24.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback