Lenovo 90UX000CUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90UX000CUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3768
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 02:48
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$298
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 74.6
1-Core 184
2-Core 332
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 956
99% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,402
87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520
Legend(17AA 513B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 261
Parallax 280
227% 273 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 238
Splatting 187
204% 259 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 195%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X102N 512GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51730A10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,139
Write 2,617
Mixed 1,985
573% 2,580 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 99.1
316% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,724
DQ Write 1,228
DQ Mixed 1,496
1,112% 1,482 MB/s
Poor: 190% Great: 463%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 1TB
107GB free
Firmware: 3001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 228
Write 224
Mixed 196
162% 216 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 13.9
2,019% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 418
3,514% 346 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP16G56C46U5.C8D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
135% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 50.8
141% 49.4 GB/s
SC Read 37.2
SC Write 49.8
SC Mixed 44.3
125% 43.8 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 2R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 24% 54 216 59 144 27.2" 1920 1080 GSM5BB8 LG ULTRAGEAR
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback