Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_F1504VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_F1504VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1504VA
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230227
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 22:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 66.8
1-Core 173
2-Core 307
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 790
80% 647 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 287D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 17.9
11% 17.1 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 14.3
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL41T0HBLB-00BTW 1TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1015 799 902 848 1294 1277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,827
Write 1,446
Mixed 1,421
SusWrite 1,022
320% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 65.1
223% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 369
267% 353 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 220%
Great: 376%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 31.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 22.6
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 16 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_F1504VA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_F1504VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback