Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHRB_FA706IHRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHRB_FA706IHRB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706IHRB
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 16:11
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 132
56% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 787
75% 620 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16FD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.48% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 20.3
5% 14.6 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 16.9
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 649 629 629 379 218 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 764
Write 788
Mixed 602
SusWrite 445
146% 650 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 30.7
95% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 452
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 606
375% 420 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 102%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 27
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 19.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 17.3" 1920 1009 BOE0A11
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHRB_FA706IHRB Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHRB_FA706IHRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback