Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive398% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory43 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231012
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 17 '24 at 16:04
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 171
2-Core 343
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 677
8-Core 999
104% 838 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
Nvidia(10DE 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 17.1
17% 18.6 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 15.9
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$185
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3200 3128 3164 3310 3350 3460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 1,948
Write 2,929
Mixed 2,148
SusWrite 3,268
585% 2,573 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 67.1
219% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,428
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 1,294
935% 1,221 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 398%
Great: 472%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
177GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1338 302 303 303 303 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,992
Write 1,359
Mixed 614
SusWrite 475
245% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 45.3
169% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 1,188
DQ Mixed 798
691% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 210%
Great: 236%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 114 110 109 108 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 150
Write 164
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 110
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
204% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 121%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
461GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 89.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 75.8
62% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 67%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
457GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 109 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 122
Write 113
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 106
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965745-002.A00G 9965669-009.A00G 9965745-002.A00G 9965669-009.A00G 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 28.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 25.6" 1280 720 ACI24B1 PA248
Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback