Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230914
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 03:24
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 276
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 653
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 1,000
62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.1% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 144
Parallax 107
88% 120 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 108
Splatting 87.5
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480V6D10H-512G 512GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.6.48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 263 228 214 220 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 918
Write 298
Mixed 342
SusWrite 223
98% 445 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 34.7
169% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 168
173% 285 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4S08G32C22ST 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 24
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2490 G2490W1G4
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback