Medion MS-7849

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion MS-7849 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7849
Memory	8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130523
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '24 at 11:53
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 100 2-Core 177 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 501 52% 417 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.3% Average	Lighting 49.5 Reflection 66.2 Parallax 56.4 40% 57.4 fps	MRender 64.3 Gravity 54.3 Splatting 52 46% 56.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 60 57 43 51 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 462 Write 166 Mixed 369 SusWrite 62.4 58% 265 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 3 91% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 96.6 DQ Mixed 194 136% 174 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$14 6,096 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 43GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 63 63 63 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 73.7 Write 77.9 Mixed 47.4 SusWrite 64 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 1311 M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 13.4 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	144	27"	1920 1080	ACR0839 XV272 S

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7849 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

System: Medion MS-7849

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	35x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	8x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	3x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	3x

SSD
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples	6x
MZMPC032HBCD-00000 32GBSamsungBench 39%, 237 samples	3x
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples	3x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	23x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 4x8GBNanyaBench 58%, 144 samples	7x
CT51264BA160B.C16F 1311 M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 12GBUnknownBench 46%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $796

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16