Lenovo 90AT000EBR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90AT000EBR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150423
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 19:25
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 143
59% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 240
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3098) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.5
0% 2.63 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 57 85 62 38 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 86.6
Write 85.8
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 58
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8N6TNSQG 0114 SH564128FH8N6TNSQR 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 23 7 60 23.1" 1920 1017 GSM5A3D 23MB35
Typical 90AT000EBR Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90AT000EBR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback