Today's hottest deals

Dell PowerEdge R320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell PowerEdge R320
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R320  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140710
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 22:28
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 131
55% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 391
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71% Very good
Lighting 83.3
Reflection 103
Parallax 92.1
68% 92.8 fps
MRender 91.1
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 94.3
77% 93.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYTY128HDHP-000L2 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT61L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 125 127 128 129 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64% Good
Read 253
Write 241
Mixed 209
SusWrite 137
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 36
117% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 196
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64%
Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 21 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 54.1
Write 24.9
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 22
24% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 89%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
57GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 6.1 6.6 6.6 6.6 5.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 153
Write 6.7
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 6.1
36% 45 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
64% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 30%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 64GB
58GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7.7 8.8 8.8 8.8 7.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 59.7
Write 17
Mixed 16
SusWrite 8.8
27% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
69% 4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451R7BFR8A-PB 00AD00B300AD HMT451R7BFR8A-PB 00AD00B300AD HMT451R7BFR8A-PB 00CE00B300CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 00CE04B300CE M393B5170DZ1-CH9 00CE00B300CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.4% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 24.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 22 216 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP2954 HP ZR2440w
Typical PowerEdge R320 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback