HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory8.4 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 14:58
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3460
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 123
55% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 284
30% 242 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 400E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.6% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 46.1
Parallax 47.4
36% 45.9 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 46.3
Splatting 42.5
35% 42.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS300M240C 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2200SC6A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 56 68 157 128 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 190
Write 170
Mixed 153
SusWrite 108
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 14.8
47% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 142
111% 151 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36%
Great: 111%
Patriot P210 1024GB
302GB free
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 173 186 176 169 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 184
Write 190
Mixed 194
SusWrite 176
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 14.4
48% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 159
117% 152 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 103%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
184GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 69.7
Write 83.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 73.7
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:09 0D 99P5471-041.A00LF ID:09 0D 99P5471-041.A00LF 52GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 15 60 24" 1280 720 SAM07D6 SA300/350/360
Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback