Compaq(intel Default

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCompaq(intel Default  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '24 at 23:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095A
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 39.9
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 98.9
38% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 205
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 3
2% 3 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MG BGM.2 NGFF SSD 512GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3105AN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 172 190 192 184 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 292
Write 197
Mixed 214
SusWrite 191
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 6.4
25% 9.73 MB/s
DQ Read 93
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 12.9
34% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 16 60 15.6" 1536 864 BOE0747
Typical Default Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq(intel Default

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $116
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $99Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $373
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback