Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics225% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '24 at 01:56
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 251
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 950
89% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,400
87% 1,400 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$569
Nvidia(10DE 18FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
225% Outstanding
Lighting 318
Reflection 319
Parallax 384
259% 340 fps
MRender 473
Gravity 272
Splatting 216
250% 321 fps
Poor: 182%
This bench: 225%
Great: 232%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 640 634 648 641 635 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,253
Write 2,178
Mixed 1,486
SusWrite 663
368% 1,645 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 77.9
258% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,205
DQ Write 953
DQ Mixed 1,093
814% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 259%
Great: 340%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
642GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3188 3612 3535 3521 3640 3579 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
520% Outstanding
Read 3,752
Write 3,597
Mixed 2,716
SusWrite 3,512
764% 3,394 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 83.6
305% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,519
DQ Write 1,254
DQ Mixed 1,384
1,037% 1,386 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 520%
Great: 623%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 206 210 208 213 213 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 111
Write 131
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 210
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
82% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.8% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.7
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 24.7
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 29 60 27" 2048 1152 GSM5BB3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback