Asrock B650M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 277%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 332%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics246% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive426% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B650M-C  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M-C
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230523
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 14:02
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$290
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 198
2-Core 370
113% 216 Pts
4-Core 816
8-Core 1,618
144% 1,217 Pts
64-Core 2,828
175% 2,828 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 116%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
PNY(196E 13D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
246% Outstanding
Lighting 358
Reflection 349
Parallax 375
292% 361 fps
MRender 494
Gravity 310
Splatting 218
264% 341 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 246%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFP465PCI1T-4400000 1TB
762GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1221B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3149 3591 3725 3961 2140 1322 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
426% Outstanding
Read 2,144
Write 3,568
Mixed 2,062
SusWrite 2,981
610% 2689 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 259
4K Mixed 36.3
279% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,979
DQ Write 1585
DQ Mixed 1,149
1,032% 1,571 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 426%
Great: 426%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMGD516F81-5200N 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 67.1
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 56.3
171% 59.8 GB/s
SC Read 52.3
SC Write 58.4
SC Mixed 55.4
158% 55.4 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 165%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 0P 1R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 25% 44 218 60 60 27" 1920 1009 AUS2780 VG279
Typical B650M-C Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 260%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 274%
UFO

System: Asrock B650M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $997
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback