Today's hottest deals

Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 20:04
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 69.7
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 181
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 421
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A770
ASRock(1849 6010) ≥ 4GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 107
Parallax 269
60% 150 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 199
Splatting 248
193% 235 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fikwot FN501 Pro 1TB
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 279 272 289 287 1278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,792
Write 1,907
Mixed 1,491
SusWrite 446
316% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 45.5
148% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 302
229% 315 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 159%
Great: 350%
Fanxiang S500PRO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN11457
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 976 996 995 998 1000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,107
Write 1,020
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 893
228% 1,013 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 46.1
150% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 293
221% 302 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 159%
Great: 385%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB-$70
4 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.3% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 23.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 60 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0FEF SAMSUNG
Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback