Today's hottest deals

GPD G1617-01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGPD G1617-01  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1617-01
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1080 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 08:25
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U w/ Radeon 760M Graphics
FP8, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 56.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 278
85% 163 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 632
68% 540 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$585
Device(1771 18CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
217% Outstanding
Lighting 306
Reflection 300
Parallax 370
250% 326 fps
MRender 445
Gravity 262
Splatting 208
238% 305 fps
Poor: 182%
This bench: 217%
Great: 232%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50zns512g KIOXIA 512GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ANGA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 400 399 412 418 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,867
Write 1,512
Mixed 1,366
SusWrite 524
294% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 54.2
177% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 855
637% 853 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 200%
Great: 372%
Hyper USB4 SSD DEVICE 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 646 645 628 662 669 670 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 51.9
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 34.9
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 43.7
123% 43 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 50 144 35" 1280 720 LHCFFFF V3GSR
Typical G1617-01 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: GPD G1617-01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback