Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200629
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '24 at 05:42
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 759 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 77.9 1-Core 62.2 2-Core 124 54% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 226 27% 209 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Device(7377 0000) 3GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.84 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.6% Above average	Lighting 64.2 Reflection 67 Parallax 61.4 52% 64.2 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 62 53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 240GB 240GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 118GB free Firmware: U0121A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 5.9 6.1 77 10 9.5 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.7% Very poor	Read 218 Write 75 Mixed 9.9 SusWrite 31.2 18% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.3 30% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 90%
XSJ-X100-120G 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0703A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 58 33 31 32 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.1% Poor	Read 222 Write 193 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 47.9 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 0.4 34% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 59.9 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 16.2 42% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NB1N 1x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.8% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 6 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	55	60	0.7"	1280 720	LRX2281

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples	228x
Xeon E5-2420 v2IntelBench 62%, 669 samples	126x
Xeon E5-2470 v2IntelBench 63%, 279 samples	61x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	32x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	30x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	17x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 660 samples	38x
36JSZF51272PZ 2x4GBMicronBench 46%, 364 samples	36x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363