Intel X99-P3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P3  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 19:36
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 151
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 595
53% 448 Pts
64-Core 1193
74% 1193 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 41.1
36% 43.8 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 36.1
31% 38 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X115N 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51020A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1947 1934 1924 943 765 760 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,352
Write 1,987
Mixed 1,827
SusWrite 1,379
423% 1,886 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 58.9
190% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 465
335% 438 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 256%
Great: 467%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
465GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 222 221 222 222 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.1% Very good
Read 259
Write 244
Mixed 233
SusWrite 222
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 40
128% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
515GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 152 153 153 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 160
Mixed 88
SusWrite 152
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical X99-P3 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback