Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3 167 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 151 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 595 53% 448 Pts	64-Core 1193 74% 1193 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.4% Below average	Lighting 44.3 Reflection 45.9 Parallax 41.1 36% 43.8 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 41.5 Splatting 36.1 31% 38 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X115N 512GB 1,595 User benchmarks, average bench 342% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51020A12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1947 1934 1924 943 765 760 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	256% Outstanding	Read 2,352 Write 1,987 Mixed 1,827 SusWrite 1,379 423% 1,886 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 58.9 190% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 555 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 465 335% 438 MB/s
Poor: 219% ↑ This bench: 256% Great: 467%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 222 221 222 222 222 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	73.1% Very good	Read 259 Write 244 Mixed 233 SusWrite 222 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 40 128% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 199 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 515GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 152 153 153 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 160 Mixed 88 SusWrite 152 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 1x16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 16 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 10.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	52	60	72.3"	1280 720	GSM0001 LG TV

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

CPU
Xeon E5-2676 v3IntelBench 69%, 167 samples	12x

SSD
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X115N 512GBBench 342%, 1,595 samples	2x
HFS512GD9TNG-62A0A 512GBBench 144%, 1,335 samples	1x
TM8FPD512G 512GBTeamBench 224%, 1,141 samples	1x

RAM
36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 1x16GBMicronBench 30%, 17 samples	4x
36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 1x16GBMicronBench 29%, 25 samples	2x
36KSF2G72PZ-1G6N1 2x16GBMicronBench 53%, 19 samples	1x