Lenovo 20MAS25B1F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20MAS25B1F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20MAS25B1F
Memory48 GB free of 56 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 18:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User JAM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 643
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 225F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.8
6% 7.63 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.8
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
684GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 36 40 43 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,810
Write 47.4
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 40.8
156% 748 MB/s
4K Read 533
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 5.1
816% 180 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 331%
Great: 623%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
451GB free
Firmware: HPS2704M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 302 268 294 121 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 1% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 55GB
3200, 2667, 3200 MHz
32767, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 51 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Typical 20MAS25B1F Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20MAS25B1F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback