Asus F1A75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '24 at 16:43
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 103
44% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 185
23% 177 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6
4% 5.37 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.9
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HM 500GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 103 95 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 116
Mixed 67
SusWrite 100
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 79%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: FH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 88 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 90.7
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 88.5
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.4% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 9% 11 89 12 60 21.5" 1280 720 GSM56FE W2243
Typical F1A75-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback