Today's hottest deals

Alienware Aurora R16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics256% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware Aurora R16  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0RF96M
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '24 at 20:53
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900F-$289
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 201
2-Core 402
117% 227 Pts
4-Core 786
8-Core 1,511
136% 1,149 Pts
64-Core 2,742
170% 2,742 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 112%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$761
Dell(1028 513C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Lighting 373
Reflection 359
Parallax 426
304% 386 fps
MRender 522
Gravity 316
Splatting 228
276% 355 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 256%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 1024GB
954GB free
Firmware: 36310229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,224
Write 2,212
Mixed 2,157
491% 2,198 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 73
238% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,563
DQ Write 477
DQ Mixed 1,143
811% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 444%
Seagate ST1000DM014-2FR10D 1TB
693GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 138
Mixed 78.4
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.2
581% 4 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66AGBUA081N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
135% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 49.8
149% 52 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 27.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 6 60 57.8" 1920 1009 VES3700 43FHD_LCD_TV
Typical Aurora R16 Builds (Compare 806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 244%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback