Getac X600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGetac X600  (all builds)
MotherboardGETAC X600
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 11:04
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-11865MRE
CUU5A, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 71.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 259
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 814
78% 645 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1071 A252) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 11.7
7% 12.1 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 6.6
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GTAESO01TBTLSW-J1C-4 1TB
695GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFI00.5
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 451
Write 690
Mixed 199
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 46.1
144% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 679
391% 399 MB/s
Jmicron Generic 1TB
800GB free
Firmware: 0209
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 17.6
Mixed 2.2
7% 9.9 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2D8MF-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 30.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 25.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO38ED
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback