Skikk Green 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSkikk Green 5  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.EU Green 5
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 11:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 66.3
1-Core 184
2-Core 315
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 936
92% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,470
91% 1,470 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 124A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 28
19% 26.3 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 31.5
Splatting 22.1
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX700-02T-80 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13683
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1523 1594 1588 2163 2154 2212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,095
Write 2,142
Mixed 1,986
SusWrite 1,872
456% 2,024 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 73.4
244% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 584
421% 559 MB/s
Poor: 298%
This bench: 298%
Great: 611%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W-SKIKK56S532G 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 29.2
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 19.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 90 14" 1280 720 CSO140C
Typical Green 5 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Skikk Green 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback