Thunderobot ZERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemThunderobot ZERO  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NLZD
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 16:07
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 225
2-Core 440
127% 248 Pts
4-Core 800
8-Core 1492
137% 1,146 Pts
64-Core 3,176
197% 3,176 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 115%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Quanta(152D 1504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
179% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 285
Parallax 264
194% 263 fps
MRender 378
Gravity 215
Splatting 194
206% 262 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 179%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KPART512GBC2DVT 512GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW000003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 807 574 568 570 553 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,603
Write 1,216
Mixed 868
SusWrite 749
247% 1,109 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 53.2
178% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,197
DQ Write 1,468
DQ Mixed 1,036
864% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 224%
Great: 260%
Ssstc CL5-8D512 512GB
124GB free
Firmware: EX92102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 997 999 140 137 188 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 918
Write 856
Mixed 1,038
SusWrite 430
182% 811 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 53.3
256% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 998
DQ Mixed 643
539% 767 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 176%
Great: 208%
WD My Book 25ED 18TB
15.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 221 217 206 215 217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 202
Mixed 146
SusWrite 215
260% 191 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 2.4
344% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Mic Electronics MGS516G52C42.MS1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5200 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
159% Outstanding
MC Read 64.9
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 58.2
177% 61.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 51.6
SC Mixed 26.3
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 159%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical ZERO Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Thunderobot ZERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback