| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Intel Thurley |
| Motherboard | Huananzhi X58 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.5 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1720 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180619 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 22 '24 at 13:39 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | DNK-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.6%
Above average
|
58% 91.6 Pts
|
26% 201 Pts
|
15% 235 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239
Asus(1043 8787) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.52
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.3%
Above average
|
57% 80.6 fps
|
58% 71.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 182 198 194 204 178 MB/s
|
44.2%
Average
|
46% 203 MB/s
|
66% 22.3 MB/s
|
52% 76.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Winbond W25X/Q32 44GB
1333, 1333, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
|
26.2%
Poor
|
24% 8.47 GB/s
|
21% 7.27 GB/s
|
49% 82.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 26: 0P 2R 4G 4B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26% | 38% | 26 | 172 | 21 | 144 | 24.1" | 1720 1080 | SAM0F91 LC24RG50 |
Typical X58 Builds (Compare 146 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Huananzhi X58
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 29x |
| Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 20x |
| Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 14x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $158 |