Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 05:37
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 76.5
1-Core 179
2-Core 347
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 699
81% 628 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4955
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 13.9
9% 14.4 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 9.1
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480V6D10H-512G 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.6.48
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,742
Write 1,627
Mixed 1,484
361% 1,618 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 67.3
291% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 232
383% 732 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 284%
Micron CT4000X9PR 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1000
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 674
Write 720
Mixed 657
153% 684 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 27
114% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 137
123% 185 MB/s
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
698GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 104
Mixed 60.4
115% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
204% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Longsys Electronics Co Ltd FD4AS3200C8GZH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 37.1
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 25.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 100 24.5" 1280 720 MSI30C2 MSI MP251
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback