Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 20:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 66.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 281
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 764
76% 620 Pts
64-Core 959
59% 959 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 24.6
16% 19.6 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 20.2
15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480V6D10H-512G 512GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.6.48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 226 223 181 182 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 873
Write 296
Mixed 343
SusWrite 205
94% 429 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 31.2
140% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 409
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 134
154% 269 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM77A2 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback