Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U94/A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U94/A  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB300
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 16:27
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel CoreT i7-1360P
Onboard, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 55
1-Core 127
2-Core 263
77% 148 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 683
68% 555 Pts
64-Core 1,165
72% 1,165 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1E26 00B9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 25.4
18% 24.8 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 20.3
18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_MTFDKBA2T0TFH_1BC15ABFA 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,665
Write 2,081
Mixed 1,410
385% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 73.6
198% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 998
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 855
643% 865 MB/s
Poor: 241% Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66AK6BX070 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
150% Outstanding
MC Read 52
MC Write 72
MC Mixed 57.8
173% 60.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 150%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0B92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback