Lenovo 83AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83AX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '24 at 18:36
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 60.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 322
94% 182 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1029
100% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,300
80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT 680M
Legend(17AA 381F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.46.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 50.8
Parallax 74.6
33% 55.4 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 51.3
35% 41.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1006P7LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 674 685 701 698 695 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,525
Write 1,087
Mixed 1,255
SusWrite 721
257% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 48.7
159% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 766
517% 647 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 181%
Great: 430%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 30.1
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 33 90 14.5" 1280 720 LEN89C1
Typical 83AX Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback