Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 319%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 578%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics296% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive564% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory119.7 GB free of 128 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '24 at 02:01
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 203
2-Core 398
117% 226 Pts
4-Core 778
8-Core 1,500
135% 1,139 Pts
64-Core 7,269
450% 7,269 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$993
Asus(1043 8901) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Lighting 443
Reflection 428
Parallax 511
361% 461 fps
MRender 556
Gravity 371
Splatting 266
310% 398 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 296%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ZP2000GM30004 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SUESR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4201 4195 4231 4249 4249 3339 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
564% Outstanding
Read 4,286
Write 4,388
Mixed 2,798
SusWrite 4,077
875% 3,887 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 80.6
260% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,590
DQ Write 1,253
DQ Mixed 1,418
1,062% 1,421 MB/s
Poor: 437%
This bench: 564%
Great: 812%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965791-046.A00G 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
444% Outstanding
MC Read 254
MC Write 132
MC Mixed 164
524% 183 GB/s
SC Read 42.2
SC Write 76.8
SC Mixed 55.8
166% 58.3 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 334%
This bench: 444%
Great: 444%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 21.5" 1920 1009 LEN61A9 LEN T22i-10
Typical Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 317%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 489%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback